Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (7916)	9/13/1998 2:42:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

>>As for the perjury issue, I think that Clinton believed what he was saying when he told us that his testimony was legally accurate.<< rich, how do you reconcile the president affirming monica's false affidavit as being "absolutely true?" you know, the affidavit that she wouldn't contradict until she received IMMUNITY? the affidavit that said there wasn't any kind or form of sex between the two ever? imho, with all due respect, the president is trying to squirm out of a lie (under oath) that he didn't think anybody would catch. that is, until the stained dress came on the scene. after that point it just became damage control.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (7916)	9/13/1998 8:47:00 PM
From: Jeffrey D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Richard:<<If there ever was a right to privacy in this country, this case has surely driven a stake through its heart.>> Richard, I do not agree with your premise. Perhaps if you had said the Filegate episode was the "stake" or the hiring of private detectives to soil critics was the "stake" or firing all of the White House travel office and then smearing these fired government workers after the fact with false information was the "stake" and on and on I would concur. It reminds me of teary eyed Geraldo Rivera complaining that certain parts of the Starr report were there just to try and ruin Bill and Hillary's marriage. You mean, Geraldo, that Bill's actions during the course of that marriage had nothing to do with it? In short, Clinton's activities in office made all of this public, including the sex. I do have one question for all of the Clinton supporters. Marcia Clark of O.J. Simpson fame was on a panel on the Geraldo Live show and they were talking that Clinton might suffer from sexual addiction. Marcia asked the other panelists, Clinton supporters all, that if Clinton suffers from this addiction, "do you really want to have a JUNKIE in the White House?" Well, do you? Jeff