Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (13911)	9/13/1998 10:27:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

1) I had already called PR on Friday and asked them to confirm the meeting for me. I imagine it will be Monday before they get back to me. 2) I called the Pat Hayton number before I left yesterday. I left a message on the recorder as I always do and don't expect any answer until Monday. 3)Party I want to clarify that I do believe that you spoke with either Hayton or someone pretending to be Hayton. Whether you spoke to someone or not is not the issue for me. We all know what my problem with you is all about, so we don't need to go into that again. 4) I won't call the Westin. If it was an imposter using Hayton's name, what would that verify? Someone using the name of Pat Hayton stayed there? 5)I think the most reliable source is through company connections and we just have to wait until Monday to get legitimate verification. 6)I do not support threats of physical violence in any way. No matter what I personally may think of a poster, it is simply wrong and very sick to threaten anyone with harm. PT I'm sorry that mkingsle guy became so abusive to you and I will support any action you need to take to see that he is dealt with by Yahoo or the authorities.

To: PartyTime who wrote (13911)	9/13/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

My only "position" in this matter, PT, is that one of you is lying. I don't know which one. I had thought that you were likely the one telling the truth, but your behaviour now leads me to suspect otherwise. I have clearly stated why your method of verification is flawed. Put the shoe on the other foot. What if that other fellow had us calling some hotel in Palm Spings to "verify" that he was not in Boston. What would you have to say about THAT, PT? Aleta has done exactly what I suspected she would. I didn't want to tell her what to do, but I figured she was smart enough to also call Pat Hayton directly. Do you have any objection to her going to the source and asking the horse? Isn't that the best verification? Is it that important to you that this be verified before Monday? Is this going to ruin your Sunday? Are you going to harp on this all day again? A flawed argument does NOT become more valid the more times you repeat it. On the contrary, it becomes more and more obvious what is wrong with it. You would do yourself a favor to repeat your more lame arguments only once.