Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 7:54:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

Not true. You need to put the questions asked in context. Clinton was giving SWORN testimony in a law suit about his sexual behavior. That's why those questions were asked. In that context, the questions were relevant and important. And they needed to be answered truthfully.

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 9:37:00 AM
From: Impristine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

THE QUESTION NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN ASKED OF A SITTING PRESIDENT IN THE FIRST PLACE; THAT IS THE ISSUE AND WHAT IS NOT DEBATABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is what a majority of American's understand. It was a setup. >>> ========== hey, why are you yelling. she had her kneepads on, her altoids in. man, it was good. what was a setup. does anyone have some food?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Joseph G.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

<<It was a setup. >> How come people who do not sexually harass their subordinates most often do not get set up? Vast conspiracy to let all honest people off the hook? Why honest people better than criminals? We're all human ...

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 11:35:00 AM
From: Jerry S.	Respond to of 1533

Hey Jon-boy, you said: "Some situations you are just forced to lie about in life and this was certainly one of them" Did you say the word "lie"? Are you then admitting the lie in the deposition? Clinton would be very disappointed in you. You were supposed to say "mislead, but was legally correct". How many of these "situations" will this guy get himself into?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1533

A Court, in fact the US Supreme Court decided it could be asked and it was. Get over it. All he had to do was answer honestly and most Americans (myself included would have forgiven him and moved on). A perjurer can not remain in the WH. Nixon could not. Clinton can not. JLA

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 1533

THE QUESTION NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN ASKED OF A SITTING PRESIDENT IN THE FIRST PLACE; THAT IS THE ISSUE AND WHAT IS NOT DEBATABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The question wasn't asked of a sitting president. He was leaning against the bathroom door... correction--my mistake. You are obviously referring to the phone calls to congress. Ahhhh! Standard male behaviour!

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (564)	9/13/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1533

john, first of all, it was relevant to paula jones' case. does clinton have make a habit of having sex with those that work for him? "absolute value of honest?" you appear to be dellusional as william jefferson clinton is an inbred liar. he lied for years about gennifer until put on the stand. he lied about tax cuts to get elected, he lied about monica for 7+ months. he's probably lied to his wife about his "thousands" of affairs for his whole married life. he lied about not inhaling. he lies about darn near anything that would put his image in jeopardy. as for times to lie under oath? yes, there are times to lie under oath. the only caveat is that you must be willing to have felony perjury charges brought up against you if caught. as president, you also must be willing to face impeachment charges. bill clinton is no victim. he's an active participant in a very nasty game and he is losing right now.