Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (5116)	9/13/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

This part of the SEC digest was especially interesting: Reece claimed to be merely an interested investor and denied receiving any consideration from the company. In fact, the company gave Reece a valuable discount on his purchase of the company's securities and paid his travel expenses, all of which he failed to disclose in his publications. He denied it to the SEC, but admitted it here on SI.

To: Riley G who wrote (5116)	9/13/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 26163

Green Oasis consented to the entry of the permanent injunction without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint. William D. Carraway (Carraway) signed the consent on the company's behalf. ________ Riley, Another amazing display of your ignorance of securities law. GRNO, as a corporate entity, has settled with the SEC. Settlement generally is defined as: completed, finished, resolved, no further action pending. There is an injunction against the company EVER committing similar violations in the future. (They'd better not... :0) In fact, this is a very necessary event towards the redemption of the corporate entity. The corporation is a separate entity in the eyes of the law, and this settlement wherein the corporation neither admits nor denies guilt apparently ends the official investigation of the comporation. I don't believe any fines were assessed. (if so, please display the link) It does not resolve outstanding complaints against others named in the complaint. But then again, you've already shown us that you're in over your head with regard to your knowledge of the law. If you don't believe me, take a look at other settlements listed on the SEC website, some of which are very notable companies. And the only thing that will redeem GRNO or its officers is the re-emergence of a viable business with verifiable orders for its equipment. Time will only tell on that front, just as in the issue of RMIL. Btw, thank you for the link. I've been waiting for that news to come out. Regards, Ron