Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (5293)	9/14/1998 8:45:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Thought I'd repost the link to the first document relating to the Wellrich v AZNT arbitration: magneticdiary.com I also think it worth repeating what you posted elsewhere that someone with experience with the arbitration process told you: ===== "bmart is confusing arbitration with mediation. In mediation, which is typically nonbinding, both sides must agree to any settlement that results from the mediation. In arbitration, which is typically binding, the arbitrator or arbitrators render a decision. That decision may make one or both parties unhappy. If a party is unhappy with the results, the party can make a "motion to vacate" the award to a federal or state court. Arbitration awards are rarely vacated; the vast majority are upheld. bmart is also wrong when he posts that you can't win an arbitration award by default. This is incorrect: the arbitrators have broad powers to make such an award. When default judgements have been appealed, the courts have in effect said, "well, these may have been good arguments, but you should have made them at the arbitration. Upheld." ===== Isn't it funny how when we posted the case# that bmart stopped claiming there was no arbitration and started to try to pretend he knows what went on during the hearing? Either bmart lied when he said there was no arbitration hearing, or he is fabricating what when on in the hearing room to salvage what he can from an issue we now have proven happened. And let's not forget that Cavalry originally said that if WellRich were innocent they would have long ago done something like this. Well they did and, well, Cavalry, I'm waiting to see how objective you really are. - Jeff

To: Janice Shell who wrote (5293)	9/14/1998 9:41:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Ms. Shell, Now...when are going to finish "procuring & scanning" any documentation about an arbitration hearing and judgement against AZNT? You scanned a form, nothing binding and a letter stating Wellrich owes an arbitrator money. You should be embarassed and admit the story is fabricated. You keep digging a deeper hole for yourself to climb out of. In other words, you are in denial, you have been 'had' by Wellrich..or, you continue on with this fabricated hype with malicious intent. RB

To: Janice Shell who wrote (5293)	9/14/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: The Street	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Read the doc's. A blank document? A letter requesting to be paid for arby is proff of such arby? AND WHERE IS THERE AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE AGREEMENT?????? THERE HAS TO BE ONE!!!!! </b?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (5293)	9/15/1998 12:30:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

I don't own AZNT and never have, and I find it interesting that the stock subscription agreement forms 1-2-3 are not filled in and not signed by anyone. Is there a reason that these blank forms are just that 'BLANK"? I thought that you have some AZNT shattering information, when if fact it appears that you don't have SQUAT with those gifs. And I have a question. Why were the tops of the agreements edited and information removed? I believe that is the poster of these GIF's had signed copies then they would have placed them on that sight, rather than the empty fill in the blank forms. Notice that in magneticdiary.com (appears to be AZNT's export license)the top of the fax is still in it's UNEDITED form. This tif file appears to pages two through seven of a fax in poor condition from Robert Quiel to Jeff Mitchell sent on Aug. 27th, 1998 at 20:24 hrs local time. Riley G Never owned AZNT, just keeping the NAYS on their toes!