Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (5367)	9/14/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

<<<You know you along with BMart are heavily aligned with presenting a very biased view of the story here. You clearly have an interest in seeing the price of this stock rise for your own personal reasons. Else why would you defend and deny the facts in such a vigorous fashion. Your interest is certainly not the truth.>>> How dare you accuse me of presenting only a biased view when you have done nothing except attempt to present the opposite in a most Chauvinistic manner. Yes, you and the others who have been used by Wellrich or whoever is orchestrating this 'not even thinly veiled' assault on another companies stock and thereby attempting to hurt we, the stockholders by their totally uninvited intrusion into our investments for the sole purpose of driving the price down and thereby stealing from us. Yes, we stockholders have personal reasons ... we have invested in this stock and do not wish to see hired-guns and sadistic basher slasher/burners take from us. If you are not getting anything from your effort, why are you here doing this. Only a fool would invest in a company and then wish to see the value of that investment drop (unless it was for the purpose of acquiring additional stock at a lower price on the belief that it would rise again someday). <<<We have been told that there was no arbitration.>>> By whom ... someone at Wellrich? <<<Then we are told when there was a letter indicating that there was an action and it has a American Arbitration reference number, that this doesn't mean that anything took place. But Michael Sylver attended this reference numbered event and removed himself. But it was still not an arbitration hearing.>>> Sounds like you are echoing what bmart said about Silver walking into a set-up. <<<You are finally coming around to admitting that it might not be exclusive after all (a real blow to BMart's assertions), though you continue to avoid like the plague any attempt to quote any passages.>>> As to my failure to post the specific clause that grants exclusivity, here is what I posted previously. <<< I did get the info concerning the AZNT license. The three pages referenced by many does not include (IMHO) a SPECIFIC exclusivity clause that I can find, but if a person digs deeper, there is exclusivity for at least one product, possibly two depending on interpretation. To find this, one must get into additional documentation at the "State" level. This is a rather complicated arrangement, but can be ferreted out by some real digging. However, one will HAVE to have access to a person that is well versed in Portugese legal terminology. The documents I have here give AZNT a license to export/import through a sister entity in Brazil. That verifies that AZNT can bring in the products they claim. In addition to the three pages aforereferenced, I have other pages that were faxed to me in the same fax. I think this is where the conflict in page numbering has occured. Anyway, I have e-mailed the info I received to several people and they have reached similar (although not identical) conclusions concerning the three pages that seem to be referenced.>>> If there is to be impeachment by innuendo concerning 'exclusivity agreements', then there would be conviction by a preponderous of the evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt concerning everyone who referenced the fictitious arbitration judgement and award. Hogger