Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hogger who wrote (5374)	9/14/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

The documents I have here give AZNT a license to export/import through a sister entity in Brazil. That verifies that AZNT can bring in the products they claim. This is a far cry from the exclusivity claimed earlier by BMart. No one in fact has ever questioned that AZNT can import their products from Brazil either. The amazing thing is that by innuendo you still cling to the suggestion that they have exclusive rights to at least one of their products, implying that there is a government grant to that effect. I call on you to produce the language for even this whittled down version of exclusivity. You can't. And you admit that even among your cohorts there is disagreement about this language, but you persist and refuse to even post it. So at this point I call on you to acknowledge that there is no exclusivity that would be likely to be of any interest or deterrence to Monsanto doing business for acquiring stevia, or any other product for that matter, in the Amazon and bringing it into the US without involving AZNT as has been claimed. (Note that this agreement with the "sister company", as you do admit, is an agreement with a company owned exclusively by the principals of AZNT and not directly or indirectly by AZNT and you loyal shareholders. What mechanism short of charity is going to bring AZNT any benefit from such an agreement even if it were to exist?) You would call me a Chauvinist, which I take as a complement when taken within the context of finding the truth. But I fear that you are the ideologue here, resistant as you are to factual presentation and logical extension. Only a fool would invest in a company and then wish to see the value of that investment drop . . . No one has accused you of wanting to see the value of your investment fall, though it does seem through your evasions that you are prostituting your probity for the preservation of your capital.