Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (5718)	9/14/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

JLA, >>Starr has had a tin ear for politics from day one. Someone could have edited the report with the political reality of "spin" in mind.<< Somebody did edit the report. Sam Dash. Remember him? Your point about the lack of political skill on Starr's part only goes to further the argument that this has not been a politically motivated investigation. bp

To: jlallen who wrote (5718)	9/14/1998 3:38:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

Someone could have edited the report with the political reality of "spin" in mind. Didn't the Democrats squeal when Burton released the abridged Webb & Suzy tapes recorded from the prison phone? I believe the term they used was "doctored." Starr's release of the report in its totality pre-emptively negated claims of doctoring and out-of-context reporting. I find it amusing that there is such an uproar that the report was "one-sided." Well, duh... maybe that's why they call ICs "special prosecutors. RS