Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Slemmer who wrote (5722)	9/14/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Absolutely Rick, this whole argument about whether the "lurid" details should have been included in the report is totally specious. The "details" are what lay the foundation for the perjury of Bill Clinton. Those details will have to be debated and verified with the supporting evidence by the judiciary committee before making a decision to go forward with impeachment hearings. If people are disgusted with the "details" in a written report, wait until they have to see witnesses testifying in public hearings. bp

To: Rick Slemmer who wrote (5722)	9/14/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Rick - you're confused - Starr didn't release the report. The House voted to do so. This is another one of those myths that people keep jumping on because they heard it somewhere and although it has no basis in fact, it keeps getting repeated over and over again, with the hope that it becomes so commonly held that it can be stated as fact. Mr. K.