SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (19200)9/14/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: Zbyte  Respond to of 20981
 
Big brother is watching you, be careful what you say here or do privately, it could get posted on the net by some empty minded republican Rushite.. Is the water your sitting in getting hot yet lobster?... Jeff



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (19200)9/14/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: mrknowitall  Respond to of 20981
 
Michelle - are you aware of who actually wrote the Starr report?

Mr. K.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (19200)9/14/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Hunter Vann  Respond to of 20981
 
There was no need to go into that level of detail
and even if you make the argument that the details were needed to substantiate the claim
then this is not a document for public airing over the internet then is it?


I disagree. I think the graphic details were essential in substantiating the numerous claims and accusations. As for the releasing of the document via the internet, I was unaware that was Mr. Starr's decision. I was under the impression that it was the decision of the Judiciary committee. However, I could be wrong.

Rediculous, absurd this Starr report is

The only ridiculous thing about the Starr Report is the guy with the leading part. He brought this upon himself. Don't let selfishness get in the way of sensibility. The man lied under oath. It becomes a whole new ballgame when you raise your right hand. And without the dress, he gets away with it. Perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power are in my opinion impeachable offenses. I don't give a damn what the subject material is that he lied about. It makes no difference to me. It could be sex or selling guns to Castro.

Clinton was just in it for a cheap thrill, he thought he could get
away with it.


Clinton's whole life has revolved around getting a cheap thrill. He's got a sickness. He needs help. I can forgive, but I can't forget.

Starr was producing a legal document from the beginning!

Starr was hired by a three judge panel to investigate the President of the United States.

Grow up this is not appropriate! I conclude hes some kind of a pervert.

I think we all know what was not appropriate. Getting BJs from a 21 year old intern while talking to members of Congress is certainly not appropriate. Trying to manipulate the truth with deceitful tactics is also not appropriate. Lying under oath about your involvement with this young intern is certainly not appropriate. Clinton's legacy will be marked by his inappropriate behavior.







To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (19200)9/14/1998 6:28:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
Michelle: You really should not comment on Starr's report as to content, etc. By your own admission you have not read it and will not. Better to keep quiet or people will begin to think you are the liberal equivalent of a Rushite "dittohead". JLA