Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard C. who wrote (25817)	9/14/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: bullmarket	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

The bottom line is that DGIV is close to a contract with the Egyptian National Telephone Company. The situation has not changed materially, since the MOU indicates to us that DGIV is close to finalizing the contract in Egypt.It was the situation on Friday when the initial release came out, and it still is the same situation today, with this clarification.

To: Howard C. who wrote (25817)	9/14/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Howard, good idea, walk the dog...and i think i can form my own opinions about what is good and what is not, but, thanks for giving a hint as to how you may feel about this "clarification". Jimmy, has a saying and I'll paraphrase him, If you are uncomfortable with your investment in digitcom, you have other options...Digitcom, will succeed on it's own merits not on how some may perceive them to be.....

To: Howard C. who wrote (25817)	9/15/1998 8:06:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Hi, Howard, hope your blood pressure is better this morning :-) No, I don't see the clarification as a positive thing, nor do I see it as a negative thing. Frankly, I don't see it as a thing at all and didn't understand why it was needed, but I guess that is why I am not a lawyer. The original PR clearly stated this was a MOU: DGIV and Telecom Egypt have signed a memorandum of understanding to join in installation and marketing of Internet Protocol long distance telephone service commencing between Egypt and the United States ... It seems to me that the "clarification" only served to define what an MOU is, so I didn't see the need for it. We were all trying to speculate what this eventually means to Digitcom as far as revenues, when it comes to fruition, as far as the number of minutes, the profit margins, earnings per share, etc, but as far as I know it is still ok to discuss these things in a speculative way on an internet board about investments. My guess is that the reason for the clarification is that many investors were calling the company to ask about these things, and some guesses were made there as well. So the be legally safe -- especially since they are close to putting out an SB10 -- the company felt that putting out this clarification would state clearly that this is still at the MOU stage, and no cost or schedule data can be provided until a contract is signed. Plus there is the safe harbor stuff as well. I am glad I am not a lawyer.