SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64903)9/16/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: Joey Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, alliances are the mode of the day, not large acquisitions. With markets and technology changing so fast, it is very risky taking on a large acquisition. (e.g. IBM/Lotus, CPQ/DEC). IMO, value is created between two companies when there is new product/market development, NOT when there is simply economies of scale (combine operations) and scope (share customers) . Because of the large overlap in the NIC market, I would view Intel/3COM as an economies of scale/scope relationship and would view an acquisition as a mistake. I would much rather see the two companies get together to devlop new products/markets thru an alliance. That way, each partner gets what it wants without all the unwanted baggage.

joey



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (64903)9/16/1998 6:45:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, >>>"Your friend Kurlak is prbably more comfortable analyzing commodities rather
than advanced technologies where he has to constantly update his knowledge base
if he is to be effective in his work."<<<

What knowledge base. This guy spends a bunch of time, energy, lines in a report, whatever, extolling the plight of the DRAM market, and then downgrades Micron Technology AND Intel. Someone has to explain to him the difference between a DRAM and a microprocessor, before even the CEO of Merrill Lynch, whoever that is, finds out and tells him.

Tony