Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (6400)	9/18/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Scrapps- <<It's just the way I see it.>> Me too! Intriguing idea- I never thought of a DNC stoolie. I might have guessed those people would have been a little more sophisticated, but with the head of the DNC lauding Sleazebag Bill for his "moral leadership" [too much even for some Democrat Senators!], I may give the DNC too much credit for sophistication. It is impressive how many completely ignorant people there are in this world. I was impressed with my interaction with Ann Corrigan in that she declined to answer any of the questions I put before or, and when she did respond, she responded with irrelevancies. I suspect many of these apologists for corruption on the part of the President of the United States are pushing or protecting some sort of hidden agenda. That a man like SB is elected and defended by such a large percentage of our population is a sad commentary on Americans. Funny thing is, I'll bet a lot of people defending the president would recoil at having their daughters- or themselves- work as his secretary if he ran a used car agency. Larry

To: Scrapps who wrote (6400)	9/18/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: cody andre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Daddycool is just preparing his "portfolio" for joining either White House "black ops" or Salon. Or IGI. P.S. Vanity Fair run an article on WH private goons at IGI in its September issue but he does not mention it.

To: Scrapps who wrote (6400)	9/18/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Respond to of 13994

Hey guys - the net really is good for something - I think we need this to lighten the weekend! (If you've already seen it, sorry!) >The Battle Hymn of Monicagate >(To the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic) > >Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the war, >They are rolling out the evidence they got from Mr. Starr, >And while Hillary and Carville plot to burn Republicans, >Bill's truth is marching on. > >Glory, glory, Halleluea, >Monica he really used ya, >Got you in the hallway and he left his evidence, >Bill's truth is marching on > >We have seen him on the TV saying "It just isn't true," >We have heard the White House minions as they stood beside him too, >Now the House is drooling over all the evidence, >Bill's truth goes marching on. > >Glory, glory, Halleluea, >Bill, you really let her do ya, >Then you thought you'd shut her up by getting her a job >Bill's truth goes marching on. > >In the eyes of Congress nothing works like listening to polls, >And the media is handy when it comes to doing those, >They can spin the questions anyway they want to get results, >So Bill's truth goes marching on. > >Glory, glory, Halleluea, >Look at what cigars can do t'ya, >Visits in the Oval Office he "really can't recall," >Bills truth goes marching on. > >In the beauty of the White House, he still lives with Hillary, >And with all the files on enemies they'll stay there comfortably, >As he tries to cover up the facts, and hides from you and me, >Bill's truth goes marching on. > >Glory, glory, Halleluea, >Watch the White House try to fool ya, >Hillary's the only one who's seen him in his pants, >Bill's truth goes marching on. Copyright, 1998, Dave R. Mortensen, Dallas, Texas Reproduction with appropriate credit allowed.

To: Scrapps who wrote (6400)	9/18/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: cool	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Scrappy, Scrappy, Scrappy, ---there is no need to resort to trying to disparage my remarks by calling it drivel--blather? Your reaction is of a angry confused man who is beginning to see the truth in my statement that Republicans are advocating an invasion of privacy, and are using their power to abuse the legal system, however you are upset and now confused because you realize the Republican Party will be damaged for years. Bill is damaged for sure, but the Democrats are winning the public relations battle by being moderate, while the Republicans appear to be fanatical in their hatred of Clinton and have abused their power in their blind quest. Sorry, those are the facts, history will be the proof. Slinging mud with a disregard for the Bill of Rights will leave Republicans with a coating of dirt that won't easily wash off.