SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Palmberg who wrote (4251)9/18/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: The Phoenix  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Mark,

You misunderstand the point. I never said that LU doesn't have the goods to compete. I did imply that perhaps they don't feel confident about their own ability to compete. That's all I said.

As for the patents. They were present at mulitple forum meetings where standards were agreed upon using technology in-part (perhaps) developed by LU. They new this then and they let it happen. Now, years later, they want to file suit against the companies that are using these "standards". That's like me giving you the best Chocolate Chip Cookie Recipe around for free...in fact like me giving it to a bunch of people. Then once these people build businesses with it going after them for the money. Cheesy. Furthermore it won't fly in court.

OG



To: Mark Palmberg who wrote (4251)9/20/1998 11:03:00 PM
From: Dave  Respond to of 21876
 
Mark, All:

RE: Patent Infringement.

I seem to recall several companies "dusting off" old patents and determining if another company infringes on their protection. Wang Laboratories comes to mind as one.

Why shouldn't a company defend it's Intellectual Property? It was their money that they put into R&D that got them that patent.

dave