Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (8310)	9/18/1998 6:17:00 PM
From: Harlock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

DWDM... Technology from Hell ??? Personally, I've lost money on FIBR AND CIEN too ! Anyone have an expert's technical opinion on who has the edge in this promising young technology ? At present, I've swallowed my pride and taken my losses. If Gigamux really has the flexibility and power claimed it should eventually be a winner. But I'm done trying to catch the big wave up on this stock. If it establishes itself as a legitimate competitor I'll be back in. My hat will be off to anyone who had the guts to withstand the pain, here in the low single digits !

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (8310)	9/18/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

>> You and others have done your level best to incite existing shareholders in OSICOM to sell and get out while warning off prospect buyers to get in. << Good advice, eh? What about shills like Pawlak and yourself who did you best to suck people into this black hole? >> You claimed in BIG letters and in private E/Mail exchanges that you knew that OSICOM is a SCAM and Mr.Parvinder, you implied was a fraud as well. << I'm not sure what private email or messages you are referring to, but I forcefully declare that in public! >> Does it not strike you now that you have been proven wrong on OSICOM. << Oh really? How so? Everything I say seems to come true. >> Now, you have the guts to say that you are doubtful they can manufacture the goods they offer for sale. << I sure do. >> Why did you not tell people back then that you were doubtful instead of advertising FIBR as the best short on the planet, because the company is a SCAM? << I still believe that too. They're not mutually exclusive. >> In other words they have something of value after all << I didn't say that. They are worthless in my opinion. >> and are not a SCAM today because they " sold real products " << Ahh, ahh, ahh, not so fast. Selling a "real" product doesn't preclude a company from being a scam. Lot's of scam companies have real products.