To: sea_urchin who wrote (1080 ) 9/18/1998 10:34:00 PM From: dospesos Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 81904
Bro Searle, I have made a lot of money and lost a lot of money being a gold bug. What I learned is that most goldbugs do not understand the function of gold, and that they are very unhappy with modern life and feel that gold will redeem their image of what the world should be like. It was a painful education for me I can tell you. The most shocking development in my goldbug experience was to see 99% of the goldbugs become converts to the deflationist scenario and still be rabidly pro-gold. Besides its uses in electronics, dentistry, jewelry, and fine art, gold is simply another floating exchange rate currency. It is good to own when it is going up (major reserve currency going down) and bad to own when it's going down. Period. In the past few weeks I have presented here and at other gold sites a number of pieces on my cycle analysis, the Dow/gold ratio, the current geopolitical situation, etc. All of these point to a rally for gold now, and even the possibility that we may have seen the lows. But all of it leads to gold not being a terribly good investment because it isn't going very high for a very long time. Under the best circumstances I can see, it could go as high as $420 by 2003-2004. That would average out to 8-10% per year from the recent lows. Doubtless some gold stocks will do much better than that due to leverage or gearing. No one on any of the sites where I have posted these ideas in the past few weeks has had even the slightest interest in them. It is almost like farting in church to discuss these things. The world is coming to an end, the sky is falling, and gold is going to $3000. Case closed! Next bullish argument please........ Aurum vobiscum, Bro Thomas PS: Taking a gold sabbatical. See you later.