Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: killybegs who wrote (3456)	9/19/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: flickerful	Respond to of 17679

jubimer... of course, now i see michel's name in the extend. markman stuff is interesting.

To: killybegs who wrote (3456)	9/19/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Hal Campbell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17679

Very interesting, Jubimer! Thanks. That's him alright. Have my own inexpert concerns about the possibility of the circuit overturning McKelvie's " patent claim interpretation " to AXC's disadvantage, but they are just too inexpert to even post ( lol...though that seldom stops me). Every time I try to condense and understand the " facts " actually presented, I start feeling confident that AXC will win. Mitsubishi seemed to offer no real counter argument to AXC's central point. But these judges are definitely going to make up their own minds about it, and I have no idea which way that wind will blow.For once I do need a weatherman.