SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spunky Beaver who wrote (19310)9/19/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Respond to of 20981
 
You sound like Rush Limbaugh. I guess that's where you get you original ideas from.

Any particular reason why you feel the need to get personal Spunk? I'm just trying for a little intellectual honesty here.

Or is it that you just can't respond to the fact that (a) Clinton brought this on himself through his own conduct, (b) the matter deals with sex only as the predicate to his lying (as Sam Donaldson said last week on the This Week show, (to my recollection) "So, Mr. Kendall, what you're trying to tell us is that the President is a liar, but he's not a perjurer," and (c)the situation with the allegations over Henry Hyde's affair are qualitatively different from the Constitutional crisis this President has brought on?

Not sure what "ideas" you're talking about. I'm just talking facts here.

BTW, FWIW, I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, Gordon Liddy or any other such person. Your posts, however, make it sound like you just had dinner with James Carvill.



To: Spunky Beaver who wrote (19310)9/19/1998 7:51:00 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 20981
 
Actually he was not as blunt as Rush. Per Rush:

The Democratic Party stands for the following.

1. Purjury.
2. Blackmail.
3. Adultry.
4. Means justify the ends.
5. Fundimental Unfairness.