Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cody andre who wrote (19320)	9/19/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Maybe he can write for Clinton's legal team Could be. I understand they're looking for staff writers who have the ability to write creatively and yet overlook the facts. Any thoughts on whether the Court of Appeals will be inclined to reverse the dismissal of the Paula Jones suit? I think it's a distinct possibility.

To: cody andre who wrote (19320)	9/20/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

DRUDGE REPORT CBS: NOT GOING TO SHOW IT WITHOUT 'PERSPECTIVE' There is no brighter media player than Kim Akhtar, the CBS NEWS spokeswoman. With eyes that glitter and a smile that melts Black Rock, Akhtar pressreleases, gives good quote, better than anyone on Broadcast Row. With a personality that belongs in front of the cameras, not behind, she is more than simply an asset for CBS and the news executives she makes shine. But Akhtar, with all her twinkle, has appeared confused and sometimes lost since Lewinsky. Is she just reflecting anchor Dan Rather's disappointment since everything started going south on Bill Clinton? Or CBS NEWS President Andrew Hayward's editorial confusion in the Era of Internet? [Where news breaks, breaks, and breaks again before Evening Newstime.] Akhtar tells Monday's NEW YORK TIMES that her network will not be playing Clinton's grand jury testimony unedited for viewers. Why? "We won't play this wall-to-wall without any kind of context, perspective and analysis," she tells NYT Mifflin. After all, voters aren't smart enough to know what they are viewing without that "context, perspective and analysis." Tell us what we are watching, Dan. Tell us how we should feel. Tell us how we reacted. Share with us how it's all going to end. But interrupt YOUNG AND THE RESTLESS only if you must. In Genoa City we trust! X X X X X