Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (472)	9/20/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 567

Sure, Mr. Know-it-all, I'm perfectly happy to admit both sides are partisan. That's not exactly where we started out, was it? I seem to recall that I was being labeled for using the "democratic partisan smear campaign", as opposed to the Republican righteous search for truth and justice. I said the topic was politics early on, don't give me this "you're political, and I'm not" line. Where I first engaged you in this somewhat pointless debate was in 428, where in my request for an honest voice on the Republican side you came back with the smug and sanctimonious You smear too much with that broad a brush - I personally resent the generalization you're making that all of the opposition is cut of the same cloth as Mr. Clinton. To me, that's as fundamentally repugnant as saying all Germans were Nazis or that all white people are racists. It is a weak point from which to engage in a substantive debate. So, once again, where is my honest Republican speaking out on this matter? I've never claimed to be non-partisan, but this line that only one side is engaging in smear tactics is bizzare. Who am I supposed to be reading to find news on this "substantive debate" you oddly claim to be representative of? Mr. Vaughn claims that Newt is "fair" on the matter, a claim that I find rather absurd given everything I know about Newt. Do you have a better candidate? Or would you prefer to engage in more ad hominem attacks, as in your ridiculous Nazi analogy above? Enquiring minds want to know! Cheers, Dan.