Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should Clinton resign? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (473)	9/20/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 567

Dan, your smear was far too broad to go unchallenged, and I assume, despite your repeated republication of my statements that you still haven't figured it out. You blatantly, and now I see purposefully, accused EVERYONE in the Republican side of the House of outright dishonesty. This is can only be because you have no facts - only generalizations and innuendo, which, in your "style" of discussion, means you must personally attack and smear your opponent without regard to the subject in question. I had hoped for better and have seen much more lucid arguments from people "on your side." Your bellicose tactic IS STILL is a weak point from which to argue issues, and accusing me of "cheap high-school debate tactics" only serves to further my point that you are incapable of anything but attempting to shout down your opponent. "Who am I supposed to be reading to find news on this "substantive debate" you oddly claim to be representative of?" I do not claim to represent a debate. I engage in it for the intellectual stimulation and perhaps to learn something. Dan, thus far I have resisted the urge to stoop to your level of rudeness, but perhaps that is the only form of communication that you have any respect for: Thus, my answer to that question about "who" to read is: No one. No amount of reading would serve to educate you. There, does that make you feel better? Just so you won't have to retype it or copy it, I will reiterate what I said about you before you diverted into drivel: "You smear too much with that broad a brush - I personally resent the generalization you're making that all of the opposition is cut of the same cloth as Mr. Clinton. To me, that's as fundamentally repugnant as saying all Germans were Nazis or that all white people are racists. It is a weak point from which to engage in a substantive debate." You've copied it many times without apparently being able to comprehend it or do more than rant on in the periphery. The statement still stands and your challenge is meaninglessly off-topic (as usual). Will you now spare us the time and crawl back under the rock you've so un-cunningly slid out from under. Mr. K.