SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (1331)9/20/1998 9:48:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1533
 
This thing isn't about the facts, give me a break. It is about all of the conclusions drawn about the facts. Somebody else could say, these facts are not important enough for whatever. Starr didn't just gather facts, he sifted facts and extracted the ones that supported the conclusions he had already drawn.



To: mrknowitall who wrote (1331)9/20/1998 11:44:00 PM
From: PAT JENNING  Respond to of 1533
 
<< His departure would have only resulted in him being replaced by someone else and would have had no material effect on the facts of the case.>>

No doubt. But I don't believe for a minute that Starr would have considered resigning had he thought he had proof of Clinton's wrongdoing.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News