SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DScottD who wrote (12669)9/21/1998 9:34:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
You know what's really funny DScott. Every news organization I have seen lately who interviewed people asking them. "Will you watch the tapes" responded no.

And now the broadcast.com servers are completely jammed by people viewing it.

Was that just wishful thinking by the major news media? :-)

Michael



To: DScottD who wrote (12669)9/21/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
About the First Unit <lol>:
I don't think he even needed to restrain taht! OK, let's agree that he slipped it to that tasty little intern. Let's further imagine that during his testimony he'd'a leveled with his inquisitors and said "Yeah. I had sex with her - she liked it - wouldn't you? - now get off my back." Worst he'd face now is some tut-tutting about sex in the workplace. I suspect the Paula Jones case would have foundered on the same shoals of consent among adults. All the perjury and subornation garbage - and that breathtakingly petty, petulant dialogue about just what constitutes "sex" - would never have broken the surface.

Bill Clinton must be dreadfully insecure. He had the opportunity to project strength and confidence in the face of a disorganized, unpopular opponent. And he, uhm, <omit obvious idiom> dropped the ball.