Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MARK BARGER who wrote (26333)	9/21/1998 10:15:00 AM
From: E'Lane	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Mark, <<Clearly DGIV said they would have it out by the NY conf. If they don't, I would consider this a clear breach of shareholder/management trust, >> Question, please. Are SEC filings usually accepted "as is" on first filing, or are they nit picked to death (for the investor's benefit) and possibly returned for clarification. I can't imagine anything being cut and dry here. We are talking the SEC, right? I guess, as far as credibility goes. IMHO..."IF" the filing was made, and "IF" JC, etc. is available at the conference and "IF" he is available to answer questions concerning the filing, then he has held up his side of the bargain. Early morning action looks like someone getting "taken to the cleaners" on a market order. Price to 1 3/4 then back up to 2.03 now. With this crazy market, anything is possible filing or no. Me? I will not make any broad "I will liquidate my position" remarks till I read something from the company, analyze it and make a sound decision based on fact, not rumor. You are a thread "presence" and making that remark could send some investors scurrying. Just my opinion again, such as it it. Have a great morning, y'all! E'Lane...

To: MARK BARGER who wrote (26333)	9/21/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: Lazarus Long	Respond to of 50264

Mark, I partly agree with you... >>Clearly DGIV said they would have it out by the NY conf. If they don't, I would consider this a clear breach of shareholder/management trust<< I agree that DGIV management clearly wanted us to believe that the 10-SB would be filed by conference time. If they did not do this, then I also agree that it would be a breach of trust. However, if they did indeed file and it was rejected for some reason, as RocketMan implied, then I would consider their end of the bargain held up... then it would be something else entirely. That is a huge distinction, IMO. Lazarus, not liking the action at all today.