SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 4:21:00 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 15196
 

Kerm, I salute your inclusion of Berkley. Is there any reason Canadian 88 is not included?

bob



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 8:21:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
ENERGY TRUSTS / Enervest Diversified Management Distribution Notice

ENERVEST DIVERSIFIED MANAGEMENT INC. ANNOUNCES THE DATE OF RECORD
FOR THE NEXT MONTHLY DISTRIBUTION

Date: 9/21/98 4:33:08 PM
Stock Symbol: EIT.UN

EnerVest Diversified Management Inc., the manager of EnerVest
Diversified Income Trust ("Trust") announces that the date of
record for the next monthly distribution is September 30, 1998.
The date of payment will be October 15, 1998.

EnerVest Diversified Management Inc. will distribute $0.07 per
unit, which annualized, represents a 16.15% yield. The net asset
value of the "Trust" is $5.89 per unit. This information is based
upon the market close as at September 18, 1998.

EnerVest Diversified Management Inc., anticipates that
approximately 85% of the distribution amount will be tax
deferred.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 8:27:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
ACQUISITIONS-MERGERS / J. M. Huber To Divest oil & Gas Properties

FIRST ENERGY CAPITAL CORP. - J.M. HUBER CORPORATION ANNOUNCES
ENGAGEMENT OF ADVISOR TO ASSIST IN DIVESTITURE OF ITS CANADIAN
SUBSIDIARY J.M. HUBER CANADA LIMITED

Date: 9/21/98 4:14:38 PM

Stock Symbol:

J.M. Huber Corporation announces it has made the strategic
decision to divest of its Canadian oil and gas subsidiary, J.M.
Huber Canada Limited ("Huber Canada"). FirstEnergy Capital Corp.
has been retained as exclusive financial advisor to facilitate
the sales process.

Huber Canada's natural gas oriented, opportunity rich asset base
currently produces over 6,100 barrels of crude oil equivalent per
day. Approximately 75% of Huber Canada's production is from four
key properties: Bigoray, Ferrier, Ghost Pine, and Progress.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
FIELD ACTIVITIES / Commonwealth Energy Drilling Update

COMMONWEALTH ENERGY INC. - UPDATE AND CORRECTION NOTICE

Date: 9/21/98 12:19:24 PM

Stock Symbol: CWY

COMMONWEALTH ENERGY CORP.
Phone: 1-800-950-2587
Fax: 1-604-536-2369
E-mail: coenergy@direct.ca
Web-site address: commonwealthenergy.com

September 21, 1998
Trading Symbol: CWY (ASE)

Further to our September 8, 1998 release concerning the drilling
of the Camp Colorado Prospect in Coleman County, Texas. Drilling
of the initial test well, named Camp Colorado Warren #1 will
begin today.

There are two corrections to the September 8 release.

Commonwealth retains a 65% working interest in the play, not 50%
as previously stated. Also, along with three primary zones of
interest (Marble Falls, Duffer, and Ellenburger), four secondary
zones may be encountered (Cross Cut, Gardner Sands, Gray Sands,
and the Caddo Limestone).

The well will be drilled to a depth of 3,000 feet. Chapman Oil
have four wells in the trend producing from the Marble Falls
zone. These four wells have cumulatively produced more than 4
Billion Cubic Feet of Gas. Two of these wells tested at initial
production flow rates of 2 Million plus Cubic Feet of Gas per day
each.




To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 8:49:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Oil Firms Target East Coast Sites

Saturday, September 19, 1998

By IAN MCKINNON
Calgary Bureau The Financial Post

The hunt for oil and natural gas off the East Coast intensified last week as a number of companies increased their holdings or expanded drilling plans.

Mobil Oil Canada and partners committed to spend $155.1 million over the next five years to secure six exploration licences on the Grand Banks, off Newfoundland.

Joining in Mobil's bids, which cover 415,250 hectares, were Chevron Canada Resources Ltd., Norsk Hydro Canada Oil & Gas Inc. and Petro-Canada.

Mobil holds interests of between 30% and 50% and is the only firm to have a role in all six bids. Petro-Canada said its pledges netted out to $38 million for 88,000 hectares.

The licences granted by the Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board include two on the eastern edge of Canadian waters in a lightly explored region called the Flemish Pass basin. The other four are located to the west, in the Jeanne d'Arc basin, where fields like Hibernia and Terra Nova are located.

A leading player, with more than 30 years of experience in the East Coast oilpatch, Mobil used the sale to build upon its knowledge and portfolio of prospects, said Andrew Adams, Mobil's vice-president of Newfoundland exploration and production.

Low oil prices are not affecting Mobil's long-term view of the region, he said.

"The East Coast is still a very young industry, and that's part of the appeal for Mobil. We can get a strong toehold at an early stage."

Seismic data will be shot and interpreted before drilling begins, Adams said. No schedule has been set yet.

A petroleum board official said the total work commitment tally of $175.4 million is a record for the 11 years the board has been holding land sales. Husky Oil Operations Ltd., PanCanadian Petroleum Ltd. and Tatham Offshore Canada Ltd. were also awarded parcels in the latest go-round.

Newfoundland's onshore potential has attracted Encal Energy Ltd., a Calgary-based intermediate. It will participate in a $10-million exploratory well at Shoal Point on the Port au Port Peninsula in western Newfoundland. Drilling is scheduled to begin late in the fourth quarter.

The well will be located about 24 kilometres northeast of a non-commercial find made in 1995 by PanCanadian and Hunt Oil Co. of Texas. Encal will have a 37.5% interest in the drilling program, which will be operated by PanCanadian.

The Newfoundland well is an extension of Encal's interest in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, said Jim Reimer, vice-president of exploration. Encal and Shell Canada Ltd. have committed to drill four wells by 2000 on Anticosti Island, Que. The first two holes were drilled earlier this year and came up dry.

Reimer said a number of wells are needed to assess a play so two failures are not discouraging.

"We're very encouraged that there's oil to be found there. But certainly it's higher risk than a well in Western Canada." The potential reward makes the gamble worthwhile, and costs for the onshore wells are not substantially different than a deep test out west, he said.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / A Farm Boy In The Oilpatch (Sunoma Energy Corp.)

Saturday, September 19, 1998
Financual Post

Rick MacDermott finds the basic values he learned on the land work with oil and gas takeovers too

By CLAUDIA CATTANEO
Calgary Bureau Chief The Financial Post

For a corporate raider with two successful hostile takeovers under his belt, Rick MacDermott is surprisingly demure, his personality softened by a down-to-earth view of the world that he attributes to his farming roots.

"I take a very practical approach to business," he says.

At 41, the former grain farmer from Saskatchewan is now the president and chief executive officer of closely held Sunoma Energy Corp., a growing, mid-sized oil and gas company backed by U.S. investors.

"And I truly suggest to my staff that they take a very simple, focused approach. There is no point in making things more complicated than they are."

He was in good spirits last week after the conquest, for $385 million in cash (including assuming $163 million in debt) of natural gas producer Barrington Petroleum Ltd.

The campaign lasted a head-spinning 23 days from Aug. 11 to Sept. 4 - making it possibly the fastest hostile takeover in Canadian history.

Then again, MacDermott is getting practised at this sort of thing. In January, he took over Orbit Oil & Gas Ltd. for about $100 million, also using an unsolicited bid strategy.

Sunoma's success has opened the gates to more hostile attempts in the industry, analysts say.

On Tuesday, for example, Alberta Energy Co. launched a hostile takeover bid for Amber Energy Inc. for $750 million in cash, including the assumption of $304 million of net debt.

The chance of winning a hostile battle is higher because finding a white knight has become more difficult. Many oil and gas companies have weak balance sheets and share prices because of the continuing oil price slump, says Kevin Brown, managing director of ARC Financial Corp. in Calgary.

MacDermott made his first serious attempt to break into the oil business in 1991, through Cormac Resources Ltd., a private company he owned.

He initially ran it with the help of his wife Karen from the basement of their house in Coleville, Sask. The firm took interests in producing wells owned by others. At the time, he was also working on the family farm.

But MacDermott was also an experienced oil well-site operator, having worked as a roughneck for various oil companies since his teenage years.

"I had an idea and I had a dream," he says. "I had a dream that some day I would be sitting out here and looking out the window and looking over at the mountains and run an oil company.

"And here we are," he says, contemplating the crisp morning view of the Rockies from his Calgary office.

He wasn't concerned about his lack of higher education, money, connections, or management experience.

Like oil executives, farmers must quickly master the ability to handle risk, he says. Their success, like that in the oil industry, often depends on the most unpredictable of variables - the weather.

MacDermott moved to Calgary four years ago to run the operations department of Independent Energy Inc., which took over Cormac Resources. Independent, in turn, was taken over by Stampeder Exploration Ltd. MacDermott was one of Independent's largest shareholders.

Determined to be his own boss, MacDermott approached a large number of prospective partners to find what he calls patient capital. He wanted to start a private oil and gas company that would be willing to ride the industry's cycles without interference from the market's short-term views.

Through acquaintances, he linked up with Susan McArthur, a corporate finance professional based in Toronto. She connected him to Fort Worth, Tex.-based Natural Gas Partners, which manages a US$600 million portfolio of energy investments in North American oil and gas companies.

Under his leadership, Sunoma, started in 1996, has become a mid-sized producer of oil and natural gas with 560,000 hectares of undeveloped land and production of about 20,000 to 25,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day.

Sunoma's initial growth was spurred by the takeovers of juniors Sunalta Energy Inc. and Paloma Petroleum Ltd.

Then last November, when oil prices began to collapse because of growing supplies and weakening demand in Asia, Sunoma moved to take over Orbit, a mid-sized oil producer, whose largest shareholder, with 22%, was oilpatch legend Robert Lamond.

MacDermott says he was unaware at the time of Lamond's stature in the business, nor of his reputation as a tough negotiator.

Orbit was picked after an evaluation of 10 to 15 companies considered compatible with Sunoma.

"I needed something that had a good cash stream, and Orbit fit that," he recalls. It also provided opportunities to overlap in some areas and didn't come with lots of probable reserves, which Sunoma didn't need because of its already large inventory.

With advice from investment bankers Naveen Dargan and Graham Weir at Goepel McDermid Inc., MacDermott set out to do a friendly deal. He switched to a hostile bid after an initial overture through Dargan was rebuffed.

Tom Budd, managing partner with Griffiths McBurney & Partners in Calgary and Lamond's investment banker, says Sunoma should have tried harder to negotiate a friendly takeover.

Even now, the industry is hurting so badly anyone should be able to work out a friendly solution, he says. "If you have the cash to mount a hostile, go and make a friendly approach - there is a good chance you can make a deal."

The strategy tends to be avoided because of its limited chance of success, its propensity to degenerate into public mudslinging and because it's seen as less gentlemanly than friendly deals.

Figures compiled by Sarah Clayton, research manager at Sayer Securities Ltd. in Calgary, show that 11 of the 25 hostile takeover attempts in the oilpatch since 1994 have been successful.

In 1994, three were tried and none were successful; in 1995, 10 were attempted and five were successful; in 1996, three were attempted, all were successful; in 1997, six were attempted, one was successful; and so far in 1998, three were attempted, and two (both Sunoma's) were successful. One -AEC/Amber - is pending.

Orbit beat the bushes for a white knight, while publicly discrediting Sunoma's offer. Behind the scenes, tempers flared at Sunoma's headquarters, but in the end, Orbit gave up the search and accepted a modestly sweetened offer.

MacDermott says he had no intention of increasing his bid, but agreed to do it because of Lamond's large interest in the company.

He says he'd rather walk away from a battle than increase his offer price, as is common in hostile situations.

"We put the best price forward, and if it wins the day, that's fine."

Rick Roberge, chairman of Price Waterhouse Coopers' energy group, says he can't remember a hostile takeover in which the first bid won. "Usually you put up your first number, but you leave yourself room so that at the end of the day you pump it a bit."

By April, Sunoma was back on the prowl, running the numbers on several companies. Barrington, a natural gas producer in Alberta and Saskatchewan, stood out.

Its stock was depressed by its significant exposure to heavy oil. The market was also doubtful about management's ability to survive the weak commodity cycle.

Again, through his advisers, MacDermott attempted a friendly deal but was turned down in a meeting with Barrington's president and chief executive officer, Brian Gore. Again, there was a difference in views about the company's value.

MacDermott felt timing - one of three elements of a successful takeover campaign - was on his side. Stock markets were wavering around the world, leading to the major crash at the beginning of August.

The other two key elements of a hostile attempt are valuation and strategy, says an investment banker who asked not to be named.

The valuation has to be high enough it has a good chance of being accepted by shareholders.

As for strategy, it helps being backed by an experienced team.

"A hostile bid is a chess game," says the investment banker. "If we do this, what kind of moves can they make? You have to anticipate what they are going to do next, to see the next couple of moves."

MacDermott's strategy with Barrington was flawless, say industry observers.

At one point, he threatened to pull his bid, making investors nervous that Barrington's stock would crash if no one else came forward to buy the company, particularly because its second-quarter results released during the bid period were worse than expected.

The deal was sealed on Sept. 3 in MacDermott's office, when Gore came calling and asked him to look after his staff.

Sunoma has offered Barrington's people employment until the end of the year.

Then, MacDermott says, he'll court those, who, like him, yearn to be in control their destinies, are willing to be patient, are entrepreneurial - and, of course, have strong stomachs.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Arakis Energy Taps Another US$24.7M From Talisman Energy For Sudan Play

Saturday, September 19, 1998

By CLAUDIA CATTANEO
Calgary Bureau Chief The Financial Post

Talisman Energy Inc. has advanced another US$24.7 million in bridge financing to Arakis Energy Corp. in advance of its takeover of the company on Oct. 7.

The advance brings to US$46.6 million the funds handed over to Arakis so it can satisfy funding obligations of its oil exploration and development project in Sudan.

The senior Canadian oil and gas company with international operations announced Aug. 17 it planned to buy Arakis for $295 million in stock.

As part of the purchase agreement, Talisman said it would advance up to US$54 million, which is secured by Arakis's assets.

Arakis has a share in a giant oil field in Sudan it can't afford to develop.

It's expected to start producing 150,000 barrels a day in early 2000, after a pipeline to Port Sudan is completed.

Talisman stock (TLM/TSE) has regained lost ground since the deal was first announced, closing Friday at $31.25, up 25›.

The takeover was announced just before the U.S. bombed sites in Sudan suspected of aiding terrorist activities.

Talisman has said the financing doesn't mean the deal is irreversible.

Arakis is holding a special meeting of shareholders on Oct. 7 to vote on Talisman's offer.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / (Talisman Energy) Burlington Resources Finds Oil In Algeria

September 21, 1998

HOUSTON, Sept 21 (Reuters) - Oil and gas exploration and production company Burlington Resources Inc. said on Monday its LL&E Algeria Ltd. subsidiary discovered oil in Algeria.

The MLW-1 wildcat discovery well on the Menzel Lejmat Block 405 in the Berkine Basin of Algeria tested with a net pay zone of 5.5 meters (18 feet), at a rate of 1,545 barrels of 42.3 degree API gravity oil and 3.34 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.

The company's partners in the field include Sonatrach, the National Oil and Gas Enterprise of Algeria and Talisman Energy Inc of Canada.

The MLW-1 well was drilled to a total depth of 3,670 meters (12,041 feet) and encountered two hydrocarbon-bearing intervals.

Burlington Resources, through L&E Algeria, has a 65 percent working interest in this productive area under a production sharing contract with Sonatrach.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/21/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Waiting game could pay off for Alberta Energy

Monday, September 21, 1998
Mathew Ingram - Globe & Mail

Calgary -- With last week's $446-million offer for heavy oil producer Amber Energy, Alberta Energy Co. CEO Gwyn Morgan gets the award for best timing in launching a takeover bid. Sure, luck and global markets may have played a part in producing all the right conditions for such a purchase, but so did AEC's prudent decision-making in the past.

By waiting until now to make a play for Amber, Calgary-based AEC probably slashed about a billion dollars off the purchase price -- turning what might have looked far too pricy into a reasonable acquisition. Like many heavy oil producers, Calgary-based Amber was much in demand last year but has since fallen on hard times as oil prices plummeted close to record lows.

Not only is the cost of the acquisition low, but the fall in oil prices has also lowered the share value of AEC's competitors, meaning they aren't as able to finance a purchase with stock as they might have been last year. AEC, whose stock and balance sheet have remained relatively strong, has come in with a high cash bid, and that goes a long way.

As with many things, success in acquisitions is as much a function of the deals you don't complete as the ones that you do. Last year, several large producers swallowed what turned out to be slow-acting poison when they spent billions of dollars to acquire heavy oil producers.

Canadian Occidental beat out Talisman Energy with a bid of $1.9-billion for Wascana Energy. Then, Gulf Canada launched a hostile bid for CS Resources and was rebuffed -- whereupon PanCanadian scooped CS for $465-million. Soon afterward, Gulf gobbled up Stampeder Explorations for $680-million, and Ranger Oil bought Elan Energy for $566-million.

AEC, however, stayed out of the fray. As Mr. Morgan has said, the current offer reflects the company's efforts to avoid an "overheated acquisition market," thereby maintaining "financial flexibility to pursue counter-cyclical acquisition opportunities" such as Amber. AEC's previous acquisition was of Conwest Explorations in 1996.

Now, AEC has come forward with a bid for Amber probably 75 per cent less than it would have had to spend when the heavy oil buying frenzy was in full swing. Amber may have looked too rich last fall, when a bid would have cost about $1.6-billion. But at $446-million now (not including assumed debt), it looks like quite a sweet deal, indeed.

That offer of $7 a share, or the equivalent amount in AEC stock, represents a premium of more than 50 per cent to Amber's recent share price. The smaller company's actual market capitalization just before AEC launched its bid was $260-million; early last week the shares were trading at $4.55 -- down from a high of about $27 last fall.

In fact, AEC was able to save about $285-million just by waiting a week to make an offer. Amber's stock was trading at $9.50 on Sept. 8, and within a week it had dropped by almost $5. Investors took a chainsaw to the share price after Amber cut spending plans by $100-million and sharply reduced production estimates.

Needless to say, Amber's response to the AEC bid has not been kind -- even though Mr. Morgan did his best to give the takeover offer a rosy hue by calling it an "unsolicited friendly offer." Amber CEO Richard Lewanski described it last week as "totally inadequate," although several analysts have said AEC's offer represents fairly good value.

Amber shareholders -- including Mr. Lewanski, who owned 1.3 million shares as of last year -- are bound to have problems adjusting to the fact their stock is now worth barely one quarter of its year-earlier value. But imagine the chagrin of those who snapped up Amber's most recent share issue; they paid $17 just six months ago.

Amber was riding high last year for a couple of reasons. For one, just about any company focused on oil looked rather good, given crude prices in the range of plus-$20 (U.S.) a barrel. Second, for a heavy oil producer, Amber's production costs were extremely low -- about $2 (Canadian) a barrel.

Heavy oil (so called because it is thicker than conventional crude) normally costs a lot more to extract. It has to be coaxed out of the ground, using various methods -- including steam injected into the well -- to thin the oil for pumping. But Amber's deposits are light enough that they don't require any special measures, making production cheaper.

Although the oil price has tanked, Amber hasn't lost the benefit of those low costs, and they are even lower with the completion of a pipeline to take oil away from its Pelican Lake play in Alberta. The company also has proven oil reserves of about 80 million barrels and a significant amount of gas -- all of which AEC stands to get at a substantial discount.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)9/22/1998 3:28:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15196
 
KERM'S lISTINGS & PORTFOLIO / Correction

The following are corrections to Portfolio Holdings

Share Holdings of Badger Daylighting should read 50, rather than 100.
Share Holdings of Enerflex Systems should read 200, rather than 400.

One additional note.

Factoring closing prices of Monday 9/21/98, original cost of current holdings is $142,931.50 and current value is $130,700.00, down $12,231.50 - or down 8.6%.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (12389)1/2/1999 11:07:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15196
 
\!/
~(@ @)~
--------------------------o00O(_)O00o---------------------

Current Holdings
For Week Ending 12/31/98

.oooO
( ) Oooo.
-----------------------\ (-----( )------------------------
\_) ) /
(_/

The below listing is the current holdings status of my portfolio. Do
not misinterpet the profit/loss status based upon solely the below
statistics. In the very near future, I will publish a profit/loss
statement to reflect overall progress of the portfolio.

LEVEL I - CURRENT LISTING / PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
----------------------------------------------

Company Stock Purchase # Purchase Current Percent
Names Symbols Date Shares Price Price Gain/Loss

01. ALBERTA ENERGY T-AEC 123098 100 $32.75 $33.00 + 00.7%

02. ANDERSON EXPLOR. T-AXL 073197 100 $17.60 $13.90 - 21.0%
ANDERSON EXPLOR. T-AXL 121697 100 $13.00 $13.90 + 06.9%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-AXL 200 $15.30 $13.90 - 09.2%

03. BERKLEY PETROLEUM T-BKP 122497 200 $13.30 $11.60 - 12.8%
BERKLEY PETROLEUM T-BKP 032398 100 $14.10 $11.60 - 17.7%
BERKLEY PETROLEUM T-BKP 091898 300 $ 9.00 $11.60 + 28.9%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-BKP 600 $11.28 $11.60 - 02.8%

04. CANADIAN 88 EN. T-EEE 123098 300 $ 4.75 $ 4.95 + 03.0%

05. CANADIAN OXY PETE T.CXY 123098 200 $15.75 $15.90 + 00.9%

06. CHIEFTAIN INT'L T-CID 080598 300 $23.50 $23.05 - 01.9%

07. CRESTAR ENERGY T-CRS 123096 100 $29.10 $13.00 - 55.3%
CRESTAR ENERGY T-CRS 121697 150 $20.00 $13.00 - 35.0%
CRESTAR ENERGY T-CRS 080598 1400 $16.40 $13.00 - 20.7%
CRESTAR ENERGY T-CRS 123098 150 $12.85 $13.00 + 01.1%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-CRS 1800 $17.11 $13.00 - 24.0%

08. NEWPORT PETROLEUM T-NPP 123098 300 $ 5.15 $ 5.25 + 01.9%

09. NORTHROCK RES. T-NRK 122397 100 $21.75 $11.75 - 46.0%
NORTHROCK RES. T-NRK 091898 100 $13.00 $11.75 - 09.6%
NORTHROCK RES. T-NRK 123098 200 $11.50 $11.75 + 02.2%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-NRK 400 $14.44 $11.75 - 18.6%

10. PARAMOUNT RES. T-POU 123096 300 $ 8.37 $15.00 + 79.2%
PARAMOUNT RES. T-POU 032398 200 $14.00 $15.00 + 07.1%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-POU 500 $10.62 $15.00 + 41.2%

11. PENN WEST PETE T-PWT 052896 200 $ 8.40 $16.50 + 96.4%

12. PETRO-CANADA T-PCA 120597 100 $26.45 $16.25 - 38.6%
PETRO-CANADA T-PCA 121697 50 $24.90 $16.25 - 34.7%
PETRO-CANADA T-PCA 080598 50 $18.80 $16.25 - 13.6%
PETRO-CANADA T-PCA 123098 200 $15.90 $16.25 + 02.2%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-PCA 400 $20.15 $16.25 - 19.4%

13. POCO PETROLEUMS T-POC 060597 150 $14.85 $12.80 - 13.8%
POCO PETROLEUMS T-POC 121697 50 $10.90 $12.80 + 17.4%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-POC 200 $13.86 $12.80 - 07.6%

14. PROBE EXPLORATION T-PRX 062298 1000 $ 4.75 $ 2.25 - 52.6%
PROBE EXPLORATION T-PRX 123098 1000 $ 2.19 $ 2.25 + 02.7
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-PRX 2000 $ 3.47 $ 2.25 - 35.2%

15. RIO ALTO EXPLOR. T-RAX 122397 200 $11.20 $15.00 + 33.9%
RIO ALTO EXPLOR. T-RAX 123098 200 $14.25 $15.00 + 05.3%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T.RAX 400 $12.73 $15.00 + 17.8%

16. TALISMAN ENERGY T-TLM 052896 80 $31.10 $26.95 - 13.3%
TALISMAN ENERGY T-TLM 121697 20 $42.50 $26.95 - 36.6%
TALISMAN ENERGY T-TLM 032398 150 $44.00 $26.95 - 38.8%
TALISMAN ENERGY T-TLM 091898 50 $31.25 $26.95 - 13.8%
TALISMAN ENERGY T-TLM 123098 100 $25.60 $26.95 + 05.3%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-TLM 400 $33.24 $26.95 - 18.9%

17. ULSTER PETROLEUMS T-ULP 011797 300 $10.25 $11.50 + 12.2%
ULSTER PETROLEUMS T-ULP 032398 300 $11.85 $11.50 - 03.0%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-ULP 600 $11.05 $11.50 + 04.1%


LEVEL II - CURRENT LISTING / PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
-----------------------------------------------

Company Stock Purchase # Purchase Current Percent
Names Symbols Date Shares Price Price Gain/Loss

18. BEAU CANADA EXP. T-BAU 123098 700 $ 1.75 $ 1.93 + 10.3%

19. BONAVISTA PETE. T-BNP 032498 500 $ 5.70 $ 8.50 + 49.1%

20. CYPRESS ENERGY T-CYZ.A 091898 1000 $ 3.75. $ 3.85 + 02.7%

21. GENESIS EXPLOR. T-GEX 052896 400 $ 2.65 $ 5.60 +111.3%
GENESIS EXPLOR. T-GEX 080598 1000 $ 6.15 $ 5.60 - 08.9%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-GEX 1400 $ 5.15 $ 5.60 + 08.7%

22. HIGHRIDGE EXPLOR. T-HRE 080598 1000 $ 3.50 $ 3.30 - 05.7%

23. RICHLAND PETE T-RLP 123098 400 $ 2.10 $ 2.25 + 07.1%

24. STARTECH ENERGY T-SEH 123098 500 $ 3.75 $ 3.75 + 00.0%

25. UPTON RESOURCES T-URC 123098 600 $ 2.00 $ 2.10 + 05.0%

26. VERMILION RES. T-VRM 052896 400 $ 1.40 $ 2.85 +103.5%
VERMILION RES. T-VRM 080598 600 $ 5.40 $ 2.85 - 47.2%
VERMILION RES. T-VRM 123098 800 $ 2.50 $ 2.85 + 14.0%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-VRM 1800 $ 3.22 $ 2.85 - 11.5%

27. WESTMINSTER RES. T-WML 050398 500 $ 7.75 $ 6.40 - 17.4%
WESTMINSTER RES. T-WML 091898 100 $ 5.00 $ 6.40 + 28.0%
WESTMINSTER RES/ T-WML 600 $ 7.29 $ 6.40 - 12.2%

LEVEL III - CURRENT LISTING / PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
-----------------------------------------------

Company Stock Purchase # Purchase Current Percent
Names Symbols Date Shares Price Price Gain/Loss

28. A&B GEOSCIENCE V-ABG 123098 2000 $ 0.50 $ 0.65 + 30.0%

29. CARMANAH RES. T-CKM 123098 2500 $ 0.37 $ 0.37 + 00.0%

30. COMPTON ENERGY T-CMT 110697 1500 $ 1.85 $ 1.65 - 10.8%
COMPTON ENERGY T-CMT 123098 700 $ 1.63 $ 1.65 + 01.2%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-CMT 2200 $ 1.78 $ 1.65 - 07.3%

31. HYDUKE CAP. RES. A-HYD 091297 1400 $ 1.90 $ 0.71 - 62.6%
HYDUKE CAP. RES. A-HYD 032398 500 $ 1.80 $ 0.71 - 60.6%
TOTAL/AVERAGE A-HYD 1900 $ 1.87 $ 0.71 - 62.0%

32. KOOKABURRA RES. T-KOB 123098 1100 $ 1.15 $ 1.18 + 02.6%

33. PRIZE ENERGY A-PZI 123098 2500 $ 0.40 $ 0.42 + 05.0%

34. PURCELL ENERGY T-PEL 123098 1500 $ 0.84 $ 0.84 + 00.0%

35. RED SEA OIL T.RSO 123098 1000 $ 1.20 $ 1.23 + 02.5%

36. SYMMETRY RES. T-SYO 123098 2000 $ 0.65 $ 0.65 + 00.0%

37. TETHYS ENERGY T-TET 060597 1000 $ 1.88 $ 0.90 - 52.1%
TETHYS ENERGY T-TET 112797 1000 $ 2.60 $ 0.90 - 65.4%
TETHYS ENERGY T-TET 032398 500 $ 3.00 $ 0.90 - 70.0%
TETHYS ENERGY T.TET 123098 1500 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 + 00.0%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-TET 4000 $ 1.83 $ 0.90 - 50.8%

38. THUNDER ENERGY T-THY 061197 2100 $ 1.64 $ 1.60 - 02.4%
THUNDER ENERGY T-THY 032398 500 $ 1.80 $ 1.60 - 11.1%
THUNDER ENERGY T-THY 123098 800 $ 1.60 $ 1.60 + 00.0%
TOTAL/AVERAGE T-THY 3400 $ 1.65 $ 1.60 - 03.0%