Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (4330)	9/21/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

They'd better not be counting on my vote, as they could in the past, because they will not get it. You are saying you arent going to support any of the presidents opponents? I would like to do that too... but doesnt it seem like everyone has been Clintons opponent here? Even Dianne Feinstein who I think is great spoke out against Clinton. If I could find an ally I would vote for them. Michelle

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (4330)	9/21/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Well, I agree of course. Except the think I think the least outrageous about Starr is the money he has spent. $40 mill for the U.S. government is less than a penny for you and me. Nada. The time he has spent is something else. He just couldn't admit nada in Whitewater, Travelgate and Filegate. And he couldn't not pursue this line when it proved no biggie, either. However, the money Starr has forced a whole slew of private individuals to spend in this unbalanced quest to do in the Pres. on so little is something else. As has been the national furor his leaky investigation, and his utterly unbalanced report, have created. Doug