SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Contrarian's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: deeno who wrote (72)9/21/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: HeyRainier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 113
 
Deeno, regarding REITs, I've also recently become interested in them. Do you have any particular REITs in mind? I came across Ken Heebner's comments on CNN over the weekend with regard to the values he saw in them relative to their cash flows and dividend yields. I don't recall the specific ones he mentioned, but they would be interesting to look at, I imagine.

Regards,

Rainier



To: deeno who wrote (72)9/21/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 113
 
Are REITs selling below their appraised value? Maybe not...

interactive.wsj.com

September 21, 1998
Commercial-Property Market Cools Off Amid Credit Crunch
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

An odd thing is happening in the commercial real-estate market: Rents still are rising, but the prices of office towers, apartment buildings and hotels are beginning to come down for the first time in six years.

Real-Estate Funds Rummage Overseas

The decline reflects the recent tumult in global capital markets. Economic woes in Russia, Asia and Latin America have made investors more risk averse, cutting the demand for commercial-mortgage-backed securities and other investments. Lenders that depend on reselling commercial mortgages as securities are pulling back, making loans harder to come by. With fewer potential buyers able to get loans, demand for commercial properties is slowing, even though rental revenue remains robust.

"There is a definitive credit crunch," says Stephen Siegel, president of Insignia/ESG Holdings Inc., a New York brokerage company. "With less money available, I would expect it to bring down prices as much as 15% to 20% in some places."

He says the office properties are the most susceptible to the softening of demand because their prices have risen the most quickly, while retail properties will be less affected because they haven't been bid up as fast.

Visible Effects

The effects already are visible. Just last month, a midtown Manhattan office building for sale by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. attracted several bids of more than $240 million. Now two bidders remain, SL Green Realty Corp., a real-estate investment trust based in New York, and a joint venture between Vornado Realty Trust and investment company Taconic Investment Partners. The price under discussion is less than $225 million, according to people involved.

"Until two months ago, money has been coming out of everybody's ears," says Mark Edelstein, a real-estate lawyer at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy in New York. "Now suddenly you can't just call three people and get three loans."

Some deals are even at risk of falling apart. New York developer Harry Macklowe is scrambling to complete the pending acquisition of a Manhattan office building after his lenders at Deutsche Bank raised the requirements to finance the deal. A spokesman for Mr. Macklowe said he expects the deal to be completed.

Other loans face last-minute renegotiations. In Atlanta, NationsBank Corp. abruptly raised the interest rate and decreased the size of its mortgage to Taylor Simpson Group, a New York real-estate firm, on the eve of its deal to buy the Peachtree Center for $245 million, according to people involved. The deal closed two weeks ago. NationsBank and Taylor Simpson declined to comment.

Landlords to Benefit

If the decline in commercial-property values continues, long-term landlords may benefit, analysts say. Lower property values create less incentive to build new buildings, and more difficult lending standards discourage new development. That promises to keep rents from falling as far in the event of a recession.

Home sales and residential mortgages are a somewhat different story. Residential mortgage interest rates remain low, following the yield on treasury bonds, and home prices still are fairly strong. Even so, Friday's report of a 5.5% drop in housing starts during August could signal a slowdown in residential sales.

The downturn in commercial-property prices is in sharp contrast to the last real-estate cycle, when almost all property companies were private and the lenders were often savings and loans. "In the late 1980s, the smartest real-estate people anticipated deteriorating prices several years before lenders," says Eric Hemel, analyst at investment bank Merrill Lynch. "In this case, the credit markets seem to be alarmed before we've seen any sign of significant deterioration on the ground."

The main reason for the decline is the prominent role investment banks play in real-estate lending. In the first half of the year, about $40 billion of commercial mortgages were securitized and resold, adding to an existing market of about $160 billion. Many of the loans were made by other banks and then securitized on Wall Street. Those banks and securities firms are much more reluctant to lend now that the market for the bonds is drying up.

Switch to Traditional Lenders

Firms such as Credit Suisse Group's CS First Boston Corp., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Nomura Securities Co.'s Capital America unit often made short-term acquisition loans for more than 95% of a property's value. Now many of the Wall Street firms, including First Boston and Lehman, are pulling back, forcing property buyers to turn to more traditional lenders. Those lenders, such as commercial banks and insurance companies, customarily require borrowers to put up at least 25% of a property's value.

The Wall Street firms and the banks that feed them loans face the possibility of losses because the resale value of their loans declined unexpectedly. The extent of any losses won't be known until the loans are sold. Nomura's Capital America plans this month to securitize and resell many of the $6 billion in loans it made during the past six months and expects to report a $200 million loss for the period, according to people at the company. Last week, Capital America announced the resignation of the unit's flamboyant founder, Ethan Penner, credited with creating the commercial-mortgage-backed securities market.

"The damage appears to be significant" in commercial-mortgage-backed securities, says Thomas Curtin, managing director of investment bank Warburg Dillon Read, a big lender to REITs.

Warburg and other banks are continuing to make loans for syndication to other banks. But a letter this summer from the Federal Reserve Board warning about too much exposure to real estate made many of them more cautious as well, Mr. Curtin says.

Insurance companies still are lending, too, but they aren't racing in to fill the void and they also have been raising interest rates, along with the rest of the market, says James Digney, senior vice president of Metropolitan Life Insurance.



To: deeno who wrote (72)10/6/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 113
 
A survey of health-care REIT managements suggests that yields on new projects are approaching the 10%-plus area.

thestreet.com

Building Blocks: Looking for Healthy Returns from the Sickest REITs
By Christopher S. Edmonds
Special to TheStreet.com
10/6/98 4:15 PM ET

The first three quarters of this year left REITs behind the broader market by over 20 points. Through the end of September, the SNL Securities REIT index lost 17.06% compared to a gain of 4.51% for the S&P 500.

And the third quarter was the worst of the three for REITs, with the SNL index losing almost 13% of its total value in the July-September period. Without a strong bounce in REITs in the middle of September, the index would have been down over 20% for the quarter.

While uncertain whether REITs will provide the fourth-quarter rally they have become known for, there are certainly angles that capture the rich dividends many REITs provide while still giving your portfolio the potential for modest, yet meaningful, capital appreciation. One answer may be a healthy approach toward real estate investing.

Healthy Investing
One answer may lie in one of the sickliest sectors of the REIT kingdom this year -- the REITs that own hospitals, clinics and long-term care facilities. The uncertainty surrounding Medicare reimbursement, concerns about overbuilding and the shenanigans of Meditrust (MT:NYSE) have hampered the health-care REIT industry since late last year, with health-care REITs losing almost 15% through Sept. 30.

While the Medicare issues remain, demand for care facilities continues to outpace supply, and Meditrust's completion of its merger with LaQuinta Inns removed the company from most health-care comparisons.

At least one analyst believes the health-care sector is ripe for a speedy recovery. "Fundamentals for [health-care REITs] in 1999 appear excellent," said Schroders' Jeff Bagley in a recent report. "With the spread between health-care REIT dividend yields and those of treasury securities at an all time high, the attractiveness of these stocks which enjoy solid dividend growth prospects is enhanced."

Bagley believes the pricing pressures seen in the health-care REIT sector are easing. As banks become more reluctant to provide traditional financing for health-care projects and mortgage conduit transactions slow, rents and lease revenues appear to be stabilizing and even increasing for health-care REITs. A survey of health-care REIT managements suggests that yields on new projects are approaching the 10%-plus area.

"This is a far and welcome cry from the traditional '10-year Treasury plus 300 to 400 basis points' quotes that once were common in the industry," suggested Bagley.

With the average health-care REIT yielding 8.8% and estimated funds from operations, or FFO, growth of 5% to 6% in 1999, these REITs could provide healthy double-digit returns in the year ahead. Bagley especially likes Nationwide Health (NHP:NYSE), Omega Healthcare (OHI:NYSE) and Ventas (VTR:NYSE), a non-REIT real estate company.

Health-Care REITs
PRICE DIV YIELD

American Health Properties
AHE 22.75 1.09 4.79%

Capstone Capital
CCT 21 1.47 7%

Health Care REIT
HCN 26.125 1.64 6.28%

Health Care Property Investors
HCP 32.438 1.95 6.01%

Healthcare Realty Trust
HR 25.313 1.55 6.12%

LTC Properties
LTC 16.938 0.76 4.49%

National Health Investors
NHI 29.875 1.48 4.95%

Nationwide Health Properties
NHP 22.125 0.84 3.8%

Omega Healthcare Investors
OHI 31.75 3.67 11.56%

While the Criimi bankruptcy may be the sacrificial lamb, the other mortgage-backed REITs have fallen from favor as well. SNL's MBS index is down 21.2% for the year, losing 16.1% in the third quarter alone. Other MBS REITs that have taken a hit this year include Capstead Mortgage (CMO:NYSE), down 85%; Hanover Capital (HCM:NYSE), down 58%; and Redwood Trust (RWT:NYSE), down 51.1%. With the combined threats of prepayment and a possible recession down the road, don't look for many of these companies to perk up any time soon.