Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam Lee who wrote (26490)	9/21/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: Danimal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Sam -- "Now just go ahead and sell this stock back down to $0.16 and that 6 million share float will go into the tightest hands on(and off) this thread." HA HA!! You're DAMN RIGHT!! If this thing were to go down to that price I'd buy 10x the number of shares I currently own. Here's my feeling. The MM's got a lot of cheap shares today. They'll be looking to make some money on them. This is a very volatile market - not for the squeamish. We lose a lot in one day, we gain a lot in one day. One thing about today's activity was interesting. We closed at nearly the same price we opened at. There wasn't an all day sell off by any means.

To: Sam Lee who wrote (26490)	9/22/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: bullmarket	Respond to of 50264

as you suggest, in the long term, for DGIV "competitive edge", it may be to DGIV "unintended advantage" that the sb10 official filing is delayed at this time. It is obvious that DGIV is entering a critical phase of its growth cycle as it is expanding its international presence at a fast pace. The fact that its financials are not yet available would also mean that its competitors cannot figure out its competitive advantage in terms of contracts/revenues. as an investor, of course I would prefer that DGIV share price is higher than where it is now. However, as I see it, the selling is due to investors'lack of confidence in DGIV credibility, stemming from the delay in sb10 official filing. I choose to look at it from a different angle, as I have stated in a previous post. To me, DGIV has proven and is continuing to prove its credibility with its contracts/business alliances. The sb10 filing would not have meant one way or another.In fact, if the delay in the filing would prevent its competitors from "knowing' too much and would give DGIV an edge in signing more contracts, it may be a good thing in the long run, IMO.Again, DGIV ultimate value is in the contracts/revenue stream, not sb10 official filing. Jimmy Chin has proven to us the shareholders that he is a workaholic who can close deals. I would think that it is much "tougher" to sign deals with foreign countries/telcos than simply filing an sb10. There must be reasons for him to place his "priority" in the contract signings over the sb10, IMO. Perhaps these reasons are those that are being discussed at this time ???

To: Sam Lee who wrote (26490)	9/22/1998 2:36:00 AM
From: chip	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

I, too, had quite a long conversation with Jimmy Chin this afternoon (Monday). We discussed almost every subject surrounding Digitcom, and though we both are reacting from our different respective positions, we're both understandably frustrated over the current situation. What I've come away with, however, is that he knows how to position his company in this market, and wishes for nothing more than to have the chance to see his plans fully implemented. I've decided to hold my position and support him in seeing it come to fruition. Chip