SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (4697)9/22/1998 6:20:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
Michelle: The tax system is full of tax breaks designed to garner support from those that benefit from it. It plays off one group against another so that it becomes next to impossible to get rid of it. I would be for tax system that uses a combination of low flat income tax, low sales tax, and excise taxes rather than the current system. Get rid of the deductions, especially the mortgage deduction and the charitable contributions deduction, and tax everyone on gross income, including corporations. It's too easy to manipulate net income and it will get rid of the double tax-free status of churches. It makes no sense that people can write off charitable contributions to entities that pay no real estate tax and income tax. If the income tax is low enough, well below 10%, I would also support getting rid of deduction for capital losses for individuals. Using both income and sales taxes will address some of the concern that many people in the cash economy severely underpay their income tax --- no system can completely account for this area.

Social Security follows an outmoded model of defined benefits plans. Few of those plans are around, except in the government and union industries, since it is difficult to match future revenues to the benefits. Social Security trust fund was effectively raided by the Democratic Congress over the last 30 years. The idiot Democrats also kept adding beneficiaries to the program and raising benefits in the 70's far beyond inflation. If the government were subject to its own laws for unfunded liabilities and accounting standards, the politicians would be in prison.