SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Grinsell who wrote (7566)9/22/1998 7:28:00 PM
From: Bob Howarth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16960
 
TDFX showed that it was/how commercially viable to implement. They took the risk. The new comers that want to compete ought to pay a couple of bucks per chip for not having to take the risk. Like Qualcomm. Business is ...



To: Patrick Grinsell who wrote (7566)9/23/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: David Rosenthal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16960
 
Patrick et al,

Re. The lawsuit.

My cursory reading of the patent shows it to be nothing more than an implementation of a linear system in parallel. It is hard for me to believe that similar thing haven't been done for years. Am I missing something here? Is there something that makes this implementation unique?

Thanks,

Dave


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News