Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (4923)	9/23/1998 3:30:00 AM
From: John C James	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

You entirely missed the point and so did your friend Mona. Impeachment is reserved for a violation of the magnitude of Bribery or Treason. Clearly, this is not the case. You have said that you don't like his personal morality or the way he conducts himself. That is well and good. but not what impeachment is for. Also, your friend Mona misquotes Clinton. He said that because he felt that the Jones lawyers had no case in law or on the facts, and were simply out to embarrass him, he felt no need to be helpful (not that he felt no need to be truthful) .