Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Starr's home video - smart? stupid? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (11)	9/23/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43

What if the Chinese found out before everybody else and he helped push through a sale of some technology? Aw, what the heck -- I guess I could understand that. <g> Lying to millions of people on TV is OK to save your family a little embarassment. What the heck. <g> Starr is doing his job. I can't say the same for Clinton. It ain't just about sex. A woman here was recently convicted of witness tampering -- she got 3 years.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (11)	9/24/1998 7:28:00 AM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43

GZ: Meet you in the darndest places! Although, I am a registered Democrat with conservative leanings I am also a Vietnam vet. While I was vacationing in Da Nang, Clinton was warming his hands over our burning flag in Moscow -- so I have never been fond of Clinton, and have never voted for him. He is man without honor. However, after listening to the last 45 minutes of that tape even I was beginning to feel his pain. Some thing should remain private. Before the tape release there was so much false box-office hype expressed by the liberal members of the committee -- Barney Fife (who may have lent Clinton one of his training aids, the Havana cigar), good old Charlie Rangle, etc., all professing how disgraceful and damaging the video was -- why I expected XXX-plus with sins I'd never heard of. Alas, like a low budget R-rated movie, nothing new to the "American People" who can read. I was left with one burning question, how much did Coke paid for the in-flight commercial? Now you are correct on conviction and the nature of the crime. But, is it possible that the Lewinsky issue may be Act 1, of a tragedy? Is a first act designed as an attention grabber? Starr has seriously tainted Clinton's veracity -- to "impeach" does not always involve charges against the impeached, but it seriously degrades all testimony. What will subsequent releases reveal concerning more serious matters? Clinton is unworthy. If we defend him, by inference we condone his behavior. Recast with Ozone Al in the lead -- but then I always preferred him anyway. Ciao, Ted