Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (5085)	9/23/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Since Judge Wright dismissed the Jones case for failure to make any plausible case that she had sustained damages, a determination that Clinton had comitted perjury in his Lewinsky testimony would have no logical effect. Never mind that Clinton's Lewinsky testimony was almost certainly not material to the case as a whole. It unquestionably had nothing whatsoever to do with the issue of whether Jones had suffered damages. Put differently, if Clinton in the Jones deposition had fully admitted, in all detail, Starr's version of the details of his relationship with Lewinsky, that wouldn't have helped Jones establish damages in her case one iota. I thought you were a lawyer? Doug