SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (5090)9/23/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The idea doug is not that the testimony has any relevance (although I think it certainly does)or what its effect on the case is. The idea is that the Judge directs a verdict because of the misconduct (for which he should be disbarred) of Mr. Clinton in the trial, his perjury, obstruction and use of false evidence to advance his position. In short, Clinton forfeits his defense because he tired to subvert the process and was not candid with the Court. The idea is punishment for misconduct. How long did you practice, if ever? JLA



To: dougjn who wrote (5090)9/24/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
dougjn,

Please carefully read this article. You do know who Andrew P. Napolitano is, don't you? Your legal arguments about the basis for not re-instating the Jones case or a default judgement for Jones are just plain wrong. I'm sorry, but I'm deferring to Judge Napolitano's reading of the law. bp
Message 5829166


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News