SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ciena (CIEN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: still learning who wrote (3706)9/24/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 12623
 
CIEN: SOUNDVIEW FINL decreased estimate for fiscal year ending
10/98 from $1.16 to $0.76 on 09/18/98
CIEN: SOUNDVIEW FINL decreased estimate for fiscal year ending
10/99 from $1.20 to $0.30 on 09/18/98
CIEN: SOUNDVIEW FINL decreased estimate for quarter ending
10/98 from $0.33 to $-0.05 on 09/18/98



To: still learning who wrote (3706)9/24/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: Bob Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
<<I've seen the printed remarks from Chambers and they made it clear that there are no merger talks underway. CSCO may become interested, or make an offer, (or someone else may) but let's stop pretending something is imminent.>>

Chambers job is to downplay an acquisition. Show me on case where Chambers went to the press or CNBC before they acquired a company. Show me one!! The fact is that another company may want CIEN not just CSCO.

Number two. I never set a timeframe...but allow me to go on record. LU is free to offer in October. So i say this is a "done deal" within 30 days.

<<FYI $1 B is not small (maybe compared to CSCO, but not compared to most CSCO acquisitions.) Chambers said they have problems, they would not provide big wins in the short term,and he implied they might not be strategic for the long term.>>

Read all you can about whose CSCO's new competitors are..do a search. LU,NT & Alcatel are the new competitors in data netwroking. The game is much different. ALl these companies have deep pockets and requires that CSCO acquire companies that can position themselve's to win. Please read..you will see.

<<No one has put forth a case that CSCO is better off owning CIEN than partnering with CIEN. No one is trying to spread FUD, but how 'bout we take a realistic view of the situation.>>

Allow me to paint a picture. If LU has networking switches with DWM and CSCO does not...who wins in the market? Why do you see Ascend partner with Pirelli lately? Simple, all networking companies need this as a newtworking interface and it's NOT easy. This is why TLAB wanted to incorporate CIEN DWM into their product line. This is all very real.

I hope this helps.



To: still learning who wrote (3706)9/24/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: L.B.Nguyen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
"No one has put forth a case that CSCO is better off owning CIEN than
partnering with CIEN. "

The problem with partnering is that it can be un-partner at any time. But if you own it out right, well it is a mood point.

PS: Does any one know who, LU/CIEN/ALA ??, has the most patents in the Optical technology ?