SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (5419)9/25/1998 11:21:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
Well, maybe you ought to check out the Constitution on war sometime, if you thing Iran-Contra is so copacetic. But what about perjury? Apparently not so open and shut a case with Clinton. And you said nobody tried to make a case against Bush. Facts are stupid things, you know.

As for stooges, right now it looks like most people think Ken Starr is a stooge or worse. Oh, I got that definition wrong, "stooges", like "stupid" and "hateful", exclusively apply to people who disagree with you. You got "facts" on your side, though. I hope you and Ken enjoy your pompous moral superiority good in the weeks to come.

You have done nothing but spew hate toward republicans, offering no real insight. The Bush and Thomas issues are past and not directly comparable because there was no allegation of perjury or obstruction of justice, as the IC has referred about Clinton. Even if you can't, the Congress will surely stay on topic and most will put aside petty partisan politics.

No allegation of perjury or obstruction of justice, in Iran/Contra, wrt. Bush. The Bush issue is past, true. He was very successful in his little coverup. Mr Walsh's opinion differs from yours, but he's a stooge, unlike the righteous avatar of justice Ken Starr. Funny, most people seem to be thinking Ken Starr is a prig these days, with only the "facts" of the lurid Starr report to go on.

Cheers, Dan.