Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zbyte who wrote (19386)	9/26/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

what I am talking about is very simple I dont think I need to spell it out.... the issue is lying under oath... just because something happens in your own home you think someone should be able to lie about it? there are many things involved in trying to prove a case.....facts, credibility and on and on and on...and what you are saying is that someone should be allowed to lie under oath following the oath of the court ..according to you...should be situational so when someone sues you.....they could argue for situational lying or when you try to sue someone .....they could argue for situational lying if you were involved in a case...would you want the other party to situationally lie I urge, if you are ever involved in a legal matter...to tell the other side and the lawyer involved... that you believe it is okay to lie situationally.....and see what happens..from the court...from your attorney..from the other side...maybe then you will understand