Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E'Lane who wrote (27561)	9/28/1998 4:12:00 PM
From: bRiAn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

the letter is exactly as sandman stated, to addressed to shareholder's......... it's signed from jimmy chin.......and if was holding as many shares as mr. d has , i'd sure be wondering why i didn't get a letter....well there the reason for the selling today ....a few more reasons and we'll be at .40 brian

To: E'Lane who wrote (27561)	9/28/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: lert	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

>>> I seem to be out of the loop for receiving information in any form from DGIV.<<< me too out of the loop...why only selected person get letter...my broker forwards all correspondence from all my holdings very promptly...nothing from DGIV... lert

To: E'Lane who wrote (27561)	9/28/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: Lazarus Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

{{{{{E'Lane}}}}} I was told that I was not on "the list" to receive the letter because I do not have my shares in my name... they are still held by the brokerage in street name (is that the correct term?). Anyway, they are not in my name. They suggested I call the brokerage to get a copy. I called Quick & Reilly and they said the letter was not forwarded on because DGIV does not subscribe to their service to do that... new one on me. I would have figured that would be part of Q&R's service to me. They referred me to Digitcom. I couldn't raise Digitcom on the phone (in IR anyway). Call back to United indicated they could not release the information contained in the letter as it is not "public information" and only for the shareholders. Since there was no way they could confirm I was a shareholder, no info... other than the fact that a letter was issued. Quite the run around, eh? By the way, Cheryl Mitchell is also looking into this for me and trying to clarify what the letter means... an additional 50M shares or an additional 150M shares and the actual date for the meeting... also, the purpose for the additional authorization. But, it seems to be awful short notice for a shareholders meeting. Lazarus, seeing their was another reason to hold the shares in my name...