SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TheRainmaker who wrote (6019)9/28/1998 10:02:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The president has said he didn't screw the intern.

He said the deponent put his penis in her mouth and, as such, the deponent's only contact was with the lips. He says that no average American would consider him doing that 10 times to be sexual relations.

Now could I make that up?



To: TheRainmaker who wrote (6019)9/29/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: Achilles  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>Put down the New York times and get to the issue.. You are persistent at trying to warp the truth..Our law is really clear when it comes to lying to a grand jury..<<

I am embarrassed to say that I've never read the NY Times in my life: another disadvantage of being Canadian. It is difficult to 'warp truth' without expressing an opinion, which I did not. Instead, I asked whether you believe that the offenses that Starr alleges are constitutionally impeachable, that is, whether they can be included in your constitution's category of 'treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors'. I will have to take your word on your law being clear about lying to a grand jury. It seems to me, however, that an equally important question is whether such a lie would be constitutionally impeachable.

>>If you sent your 21 year old daughter to work at the Whitehouse and the President screwed your daughter..did he have a sexual affair with her or not??<<

Define screw. ;-)