Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (4861)	9/29/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: TradeOfTheDay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

I'd think it would have to be... every other financial should have been impacted favorably I would think... unless it was just sell the news since the expectation was built in. Oh well - was out of ammo anyway .

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (4861)	9/30/1998 8:48:00 AM
From: Nemer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

====> I think so but I can't find a scrap of info what I said, isn't that strange ?....perhaps 3 Billion is just pocket change these days. There was a article in the Dallas Morning News today by Marcy Gordon which stated that Chase was exposed to the hedges in the amount of 3.2 Billion, of which all but 300 Million was secured by cash, T bonds, corporate bonds, and other securities. It wasn't clear whether the 300 mil of unsecured coincided with the 300 mil which Chase contributed to Long-Term Capital. I went to the DMN web site to see if I could send you the article, but it wasn't listed. The article was about 16 column inches, so it wasn't a major one even though it wasn't a small one either.