Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (37753)	9/29/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Maxwell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572298

Yousef: <<Maxwell, you seem to want to live in the past ... Do you think that AMD will offer to replace K6-2's with the problem ??>> Yousef, you seem to want to ignore reality....Do you think that INTC will offer to replace all the PII that were shipped initially with the bug? Also do you think that INTC will offer to replace all the Xeon that are currently shipped with the bug in it? Maxwell

To: Yousef who wrote (37753)	9/29/1998 9:07:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572298

Yousef, <offer to replace K6-2's with the problem ??> K6-350 has NO PROBLEM. Windows 95B has a hidden bug. How shameless you are all Intelidiots. Do you ever have a brain? If you do not, then just repeat several times, it may help you: "K6-350 has NO PROBLEM. Windows 95B has a hidden bug!" This bug will surface sooner of later. There are many more bugs in MS Windows. P-II did not run into this because they are slower than K6 on LOOP command used to measure the CPU speed in their timing loops. If you want to avoid this bug without a patch, just run the same K6 at 300MHz. Or 333. Could you all now just shut up?