To: go4it who wrote (5835 ) 10/1/1998 11:24:00 AM From: BobS Respond to of 11603
<< What would you think of the merger if the extraction method were already proven and known to work? >> Charles, If that were the case there wouldn't be a need for a buy-out, correct? IPM would still exist and likely would be a thriving company. As for helping IPM pay down debt, didn't IPM declare bankruptcy? What debt exists after declaring bankruptcy? And again, why should Maxam pay off another company's supposed still-existing debt? In a previous post you asked me to think about the business aspects of such an event. When buying another company there are two points that should be addressed - how long is the payback period and what is the schedule of earnings from the investment (ROI schedule) Currently, the payback period is unknown. Maxam shells out money and gets property that has no value today. It also gets procedures, assay results, and recovery results that have no value today. Schedule of earnings is unknown. Maxam does not have any idea when it will be able to obtain profit from the IPM land and/or processes. To date, they are both unproven. If it were my company I think I want to work with some known payback and ROI numbers. Certainly, Maxam could know something positive about IPM that we don't, but we've been waiting for such unknown positive information for all these DD companies for about 2 years. I'll believe it when I see it. As for who owns Maxam shares, I honestly can't say. I thought I had a Maxam prospectus but it turned out to be Windstar. However, I seem to recall Runyon owned something like 46% of the shares in Maxam. There was a big deal made earlier in the year of his big ownership in the company. If you have the figures, could you post them? bobs.