Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (6263)	9/30/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Dan - I have to point out something, re: "politcal contributions overall are already heavily weighted toward the Repubclican side. Do you dispute that?" Yes. It is in dispute because we do not know about all of the political contributions (yet). We're still waiting for things like definitions of "controlling legal authority." <g> Maybe after the WH finds its you-know-what in another crack, we'll find out how much the Democrats really get and where it comes from. Of the contributions we think we know about, that may be true in terms of cash recorded - but the accounting probably does not include all of the billions of dollars worth of "news" air-time devoted to misleading and scaring the bejeezus out of the uninformed public about the greedy, mean, "starve the elderly and children" Republicans, now does it? Mr. K.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (6263)	9/30/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Republicans have to spend more to counteract the fact that the Democrats have the TV news and 90% of the press on their side. Do you dispute that?