Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (1414)	9/30/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: steve gilchrist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1706

"Bill Jackson will never agree with me. He has his own agenda. However I hope that I can convince you. I don't want you to lose what remains of your investment. Please reconsider your position. We can reach an agreement. I sense you are a reasonable person." Gee, Mike. I'm glad you care so deeply for our investments, I can just imagine the warm rumble of your voice, the dazzle in your smile...it's just that it feels like such a "crocodile smile" - like maybe dumping our investments could salvage your investment? I'm sure I've heard the exact same lines from the last used car salesman I was polite enough to listen to...or various politicians, particularly in Ontario. Steve G>)

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (1414)	9/30/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Gabe Heti	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1706

I've been following the Kemess situation because of an investment in Antares. I have no investment in Royal Oak and never did have. However, I simply do not accept your assertion that they will go under. I also find it quite insulting that you should be pushing your negative views when you are short and are anxious to see Royal Oak go under. By the way, if I did have to decide which way to go on Royal Oak I would go long and definitely not short. Gabe