SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (37938)10/2/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571802
 
Stocky , <So what EXACTLY is the flaw>

Something looks up today despite of the "flaw",
don't you think?

Could it be another AMD win for K6-2-350?

Sure you think no one would use the processor
with the speed "flaw".

You sure think the brand-name houses like Sony
would never be so stupid to use the speed-flawed
K6, he-he-he.




To: StockMan who wrote (37938)10/3/1998 12:12:00 AM
From: Steven Ivanyi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571802
 
This flaw in the AMD higher speed processers is not really a flaw. It is a problem with windows 95, apparently the speed is too fast. It is not a problem with the newer windows 98 or windows nt4, which technically can work on processers with speeds in excesss of 600 MHZ.
To call it a flaw is both misleading and false.

Steven,
Yah, let's make it so.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News