Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (6699)	10/2/1998 6:59:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Oh blither blather. Clinton would never be convicted of perjury in the Jones case by a jury. Only a horribly unsympathetic defendant would be. (Which of course he is among the religious right.) Even Starr only had three instances of lying under oath which he claimed for Clinton's GJ testimony. Two were typical Starr extremist stretches that would go nowhere. The third is absolutely not something Starr does our could prove. (Did he diddle her or didn't her.) Just not the stuff of a perjury conviction. When the whole expercise was a perjury trap to begin with. Which, oh yes, a jury would find most relevant. Doug