SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (65779)10/2/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer,

Re: "Intel seems to be able to manufacture them. This may be an option
available only to Intel."

I wouldn't quite make that statement ... I believe that the HWP design
employs redundancy which will allow the cache SRAM to yield at high levels
without Intel's manufacturing capabilities.

Yousef



To: Elmer who wrote (65779)10/3/1998 5:31:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer,

No I did not miss the point.

Pauleron was HYPEING intels leadership of new era of chip design complexity.

At best he worded it poorly at worst he was his usual disengenous self.

By the way yielding 140 million transistors is great.

By the way, the chip only runs at 360 mhz. Perhaps Yousef can comment on wether Intel is using slower fets or something for these HP chips compared to Intels own PII's.

Also some SPEC numbers on the monster chip would be interesting.
If it is a massive chip but it's performance sucks compared to the new Alpha's then HP's chip could be slow and expensive.

Some actual facts rather than HYPE would be great.

Regards,

Kash