Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (38078)	10/4/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Maxwell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572033

Yousef: I made an error, instead of << Expected speed (Desktop)0.6GHz->0.9GHz 6.5GHz->1GHz 0.9GHz->1.3GHz Expected speed (Mobile) 0.4GHz->0.6GHz 4.5GHz->6.5GHz 0.6GHz->0.75GHz >> it should be Expected speed(Desktop)0.6GHz->0.9GHz 0.65GHz->1GHz 0.9GHz->1.3GHz Expected speed(Mobile) 0.4GHz->0.6GHz 0.45GHz->0.65GHz 0.6GHz->0.75GHz <<Are you "joking around" again, Maxwell .>> What's wrong? You don't like MOT process? If you look closely their FETs are superior to Intel. Nchannel and Pchannel need to be high to hit the 1GHz limit. Copper will really help when the speed is that high. MOT advanced 0.18um process will employ SOI which will increase the speed by 30% and power dissipation by up to 50%. That is why you see MOT's advantage for mobile. As I have said it many time, Intel is behind and will behind in process technology. Without copper and SOI they are defenseless in the "gigahertz regime". Maxwell