Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jach who wrote (17722)	10/5/1998 1:16:00 PM
From: jach	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

time to get a bigger truck and load csco at 47$, csco now is a big bargain, IMO; analyst just cut change from strong buy to buy and DOJ inestigation is premature in nature; csco said they're going to make the #s this qtr; this is just panic selling- ---------------------- SG CowenSecurities on Monday said analyst Chris Stix lowered his view on the stocks of networking companies Cisco Systems Inc. and FORE Systems Inc. Stix cut his rating on Cisco shares to buy from strong buy.

To: jach who wrote (17722)	10/5/1998 1:16:00 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

jach, Good call for now. Lets see what you can do over 30 years! Eric

To: jach who wrote (17722)	10/5/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

>>now, what do all think about this posted a week or so ago ?<< I thought the post was written by a 7 year old. It was incoherent and unintelligable. The few points I could make of it were boilerplate cons of something or another that are standard arguements in Business Week, WSJ, TSC, Investor's Daily, etc....and not worthy of my time. So after a few seconds, I flipped to the next post. For starters, why don't you learn how to write a nice, clean sentence? After that, why don't you get off your high horse of which nobody could give a sh*t about anyways.

To: jach who wrote (17722)	10/5/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Joseph G.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

man, did not I tell you it's going to $30? not to smart to buy at $57, is it?

To: jach who wrote (17722)	10/5/1998 6:28:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Respond to of 77400

I think two things. You called for downside risk due to earnings. So, you're were wrong. Second, I still think your head is too big to fit through the door. OG