SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Derivatives: Darth Vader's Revenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (392)10/5/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2794
 
My original point was that situation never arrived. Chase didn't make the loan at 12% and violate usury laws, they just didn't make loans in that case. In any event the usury limits were set higher and were changed before it became a major issue. It did however shut out some lending. But not making the loan is not a case of someone being allowed to evade the law, it was in fact strict adherence. To use your example the driver did not go 65 and break the 55 limit, he pulled over and stopped.



To: ahhaha who wrote (392)10/5/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: EPS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2794
 
Godel proved that if you make a system of axioms infinitely strong there still exists within
the system truths not provable from the axioms. Are those truths non sequitir?

Is is worst than that. If we were sure that they were truths why bother to prove them? What Godel showed was that we cannot decide if they are true or not..

Victor


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News